1999 Daewoo Musson vs. 1966 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Musson is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,198 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Musson is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Musson (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1966 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Musson should accelerate faster than 1966 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Musson weights approximately 66 kg more than 1966 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Musson (420 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Musson will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Daewoo Musson | 1966 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Jeep |
| Model | Musson | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3198 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1096 kg | 1030 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2060 mm |
