1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 88 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 410 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Renault Clio (131 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l. (120 Nm). This means 1998 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Daihatsu | Renault |
Model | Micros 3l | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 131 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 570 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1570 mm | 2580 mm |