1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l. (88 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l.
Because 2011 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Micros 3l | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Micros 3l | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 88 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 2510 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1570 mm | 2490 mm |