1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daihatsu Naked (56 HP @ 7600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Naked should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daihatsu Naked weights approximately 30 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (65 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Daihatsu Naked | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Zastava |
| Model | Naked | 102 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 659 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2160 mm |
