1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1999 Daihatsu Naked is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (56 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Daihatsu Naked has automatic transmission and 1986 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 1986 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Daihatsu Naked will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Naked | Ranger |
Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1770 mm |