1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (56 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 325 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (64 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Naked | E-250 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 132 L |