1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (56 HP @ 7600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 505 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (65 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Daihatsu | Dodge |
Model | Naked | Charger |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 7600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 72 L |