1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 1,982 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 640 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (240 Nm @ 1850 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (65 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Naked | S60 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 65 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1850 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |