1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (62 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 924 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. 2009 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1999 Daihatsu Naked has manual transmission. 1999 Daihatsu Naked will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 2009 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Daihatsu | Jaguar |
Model | Naked | XJ |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 560 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3170 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 84 L |