1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2009 Maybach 62
To start off, 2009 Maybach 62 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Maybach 62 (543 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 481 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (62 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Maybach 62 weights approximately 2045 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Maybach 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Maybach 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Naked, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 793 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. 2009 Maybach 62 has automatic transmission and 1999 Daihatsu Naked has manual transmission. 1999 Daihatsu Naked will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Maybach 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 2009 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Maybach |
Model | Naked | 62 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 543 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 900 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 2855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 6170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 110 L |