1999 Daihatsu Naked vs. 2009 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daihatsu Naked. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daihatsu Naked would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (62 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 1063 kg more than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daihatsu Naked is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 SsangYong Rodius. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daihatsu Naked will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. (107 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daihatsu Naked. 2009 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1999 Daihatsu Naked has manual transmission. 1999 Daihatsu Naked will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daihatsu Naked | 2009 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Daihatsu | SsangYong |
Model | Naked | Rodius |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 657 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.5 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 80 L |