1999 De Tomaso Bigua vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 De Tomaso Bigua is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua (302 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 De Tomaso Bigua weights approximately 105 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 De Tomaso Bigua (407 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 De Tomaso Bigua will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 De Tomaso Bigua | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Triumph |
Model | Bigua | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |