1999 De Tomaso Guara vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 De Tomaso Guara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 De Tomaso Guara would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 De Tomaso Guara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 De Tomaso Guara (282 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 De Tomaso Guara should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1999 De Tomaso Guara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 De Tomaso Guara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 De Tomaso Guara (403 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1999 De Tomaso Guara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1999 De Tomaso Guara | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Mazda |
Model | Guara | 3 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 403 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |