1999 Dodge Caravan vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 Dodge Caravan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Caravan (131 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 630 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Caravan (174 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Caravan | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Caravan | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
