1999 Dodge Caravan vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Dodge Caravan is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 227 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Caravan | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Caravan | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1707 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |