1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 498 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Charger | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 225 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1578 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2600 mm |
