1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 220 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1958 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Dodge | Studebaker |
| Model | Charger | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1958 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1300 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2980 mm |
