1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 251 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 155 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Charger | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Charger | Corona |
Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 74 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 925 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2430 mm |