1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600. (163 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600 weights approximately 8 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1967 Alfa Romeo 2600 | |
| Make | Dodge | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Charger | 2600 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2583 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
