1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1968 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,024 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1968 Holden Monaro. (181 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Monaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Monaro weights approximately 98 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1968 Holden Monaro has automatic transmission and 1999 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1999 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Holden Monaro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1968 Holden Monaro | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Charger | Monaro |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 5024 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 181 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2830 mm |
