1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1972 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 42 kg more than 1972 Nissan 240 C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1972 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Charger | 240 C |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2700 mm |
