1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1976 Renault Siete
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Siete would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1976 Renault Siete. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 547 kg more than 1976 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 1976 Renault Siete | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Charger | Siete |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1037 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2540 mm |
