1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1996 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 192 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 435 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Charger | 1996 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 133 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 3030 mm |