1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Honda Logo
To start off, 2000 Honda Logo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 261 more horse power than 2000 Honda Logo. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Logo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 140 kg more than 2000 Honda Logo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 2000 Honda Logo | |
| Make | Dodge | Honda |
| Model | Charger | Logo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 64 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 940 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2370 mm |
