1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (325 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 405 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Charger | M250 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 176 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 675 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2520 mm |
