1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2002 TVR T 350
To start off, 2002 TVR T 350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (345 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1999 Dodge Charger. (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1999 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 132 kg more than 2002 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 2002 TVR T 350 | |
| Make | Dodge | TVR |
| Model | Charger | T 350 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4240 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |
