1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1999 Dodge Charger. (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 391 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
| Model | Charger | XK |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1753 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2590 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |
