1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2005 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2005 Jeep Commander is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. Both 1999 Dodge Charger and 2005 Jeep Commander are equipped with a 4,700 cc engine.
Because 2005 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1999 Dodge Charger has manual transmission. 1999 Dodge Charger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Charger | 2005 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Charger | Commander |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2790 mm |