1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2005 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2500 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B2500. (204 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 343 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Because 2005 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 2005 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Charger | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 4030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2990 mm |
