1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (159 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 172 kg more than 2006 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Charger | 2006 MG TF | |
| Make | Dodge | MG |
| Model | Charger | TF |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 321 HP | 159 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |
