1999 Dodge Charger vs. 2010 Subaru Forester
To start off, 2010 Subaru Forester is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2010 Subaru Forester. (145 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2010 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Forester weights approximately 188 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Because 2010 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Dodge Charger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Charger | 2010 Subaru Forester | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Charger | Forester |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1674 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2616 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |