1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 1963 Mini MK I
To start off, 1999 Dodge Dakota is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 465 kg more than 1963 Mini MK I.
Because 1999 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Dakota | 1963 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Dodge | Mini |
| Model | Dakota | MK I |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 468 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2040 mm |
