1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 1972 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1999 Dodge Dakota is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph Stag weights approximately 120 kg more than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph Stag. (193 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph Stag.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 1972 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Dakota | Stag |
Year Released | 1999 | 1972 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 193 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2550 mm |