1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara
To start off, 1999 Dodge Dakota is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Monteverdi Sahara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Monteverdi Sahara would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Monteverdi Sahara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara has automatic transmission and 1999 Dodge Dakota has manual transmission. 1999 Dodge Dakota will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Monteverdi Sahara will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 1978 Monteverdi Sahara | |
Make | Dodge | Monteverdi |
Model | Dakota | Sahara |
Year Released | 1999 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3253 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2550 mm |