1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 1992 Rover 400
To start off, 1999 Dodge Dakota is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 400 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Rover 400 weights approximately 96 kg more than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Because 1999 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 1992 Rover 400 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Dakota | 400 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1176 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2560 mm |