1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 2001 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2001 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 725 more horse power than 1999 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1999 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 450 kg more than 2001 Lotec C 1000.
Because 1999 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 794 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Dodge Dakota. (196 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2001 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 2001 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Dodge | Lotec |
Model | Dakota | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2456 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 843 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 196 Nm | 990 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1150 mm |