1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 2006 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda CX-7. (350 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda CX-7. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1999 Dodge Dakota has manual transmission. 1999 Dodge Dakota will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 2006 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Dakota | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2298 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |