1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Dakota | Commodore |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |