1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Dakota would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 360 kg more than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (400 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Dakota | Evora |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2575 mm |