1999 Dodge Dakota vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 426 kg more than 1999 Dodge Dakota.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Dakota (468 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Z. (374 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Z.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Dakota | 2013 Nissan Z | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Dakota | Z |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 327 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 374 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3330 mm | 2550 mm |