1999 Dodge Durango vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1999 Dodge Durango is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Durango (360 HP) has 290 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Durango weights approximately 137 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Durango (559 Nm) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Dodge Durango | 1982 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Durango | Colt |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 360 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 559 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2390 mm |
