1999 Dodge Durango vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Durango. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Durango would be higher. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (574 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1999 Dodge Durango. (360 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1999 Dodge Durango. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 691 kg more than 1999 Dodge Durango. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (800 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Dodge Durango. (559 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Dodge Durango.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Durango | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Durango | CLK |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 360 HP | 574 HP |
Torque | 559 Nm | 800 Nm |
Top Speed | 228 km/hour | 320 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1057 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2970 mm |