1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 (491 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 weights approximately 2885 kg more than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 (804 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge T-Rex 6x6 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | T-Rex 6x6 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7999 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 491 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 804 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 5400 kg | 2515 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2890 mm |