1999 Dodge Viper vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Dodge Viper is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 8,424 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Viper (670 HP) has 570 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Viper weights approximately 111 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Viper | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Viper | Mustang |
Year Released | 1999 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8424 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 670 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |