1999 Dodge Viper vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane
To start off, 1999 Dodge Viper is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 7,990 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Viper (460 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. (325 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Viper weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Viper (678 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mercury Park Lane. (602 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Viper | 1967 Mercury Park Lane | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Viper | Park Lane |
Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7990 cc | 6722 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 325 HP |
Torque | 678 Nm | 602 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1360 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 3130 mm |