1999 Dodge Viper vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Viper would be higher. At 8,424 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Viper (670 HP) has 600 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Viper weights approximately 346 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Dodge Viper (913 Nm) has 811 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1999 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Viper | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Dodge | MCC |
Model | Viper | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 8424 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 670 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 913 Nm | 102 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1810 mm |