1999 Donkervoort D8 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1999 Donkervoort D8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Donkervoort D8 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 509 kg more than 1999 Donkervoort D8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Donkervoort D8 (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1999 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Donkervoort D8 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Donkervoort | Holden |
Model | D8 | EJ |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2680 mm |