1999 Donkervoort D8 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Donkervoort D8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Donkervoort D8 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Donkervoort D8 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 669 kg more than 1999 Donkervoort D8.
Because 1999 Donkervoort D8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Donkervoort D8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Donkervoort D8 (210 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Donkervoort D8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Donkervoort D8 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Donkervoort | Mazda |
Model | D8 | 6 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 625 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2730 mm |