1999 Eagle Talon vs. 2001 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2001 Holden Maloo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Eagle Talon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Eagle Talon would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden Maloo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden Maloo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Talon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Eagle Talon | 2001 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Eagle | Holden |
Model | Talon | Maloo |
Year Released | 1999 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |