1999 Eagle Vision vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1999 Eagle Vision is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Eagle Vision weights approximately 130 kg more than 1968 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Eagle Vision | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Eagle | Jaguar |
| Model | Vision | 240 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2698 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
